The Assessment: Phil Jones’ Dilemma
The Assessment: Phil Jones’ Dilemma
Phil Jones is a project leader at Engineering Co and leader of a team operating in six different geographical locations across two time zones. Phil is a mechanical engineer and his technical skills have been recognised by Engineering Co and he has made steady progress with the company since leaving university.
Phil has been the Senior Project Team Leader for six months on a blue chip project, an integrated rail and metro system in the Gulf region of the Middle East. The project went out to global tender and Engineering Co won the contract for supplying rails, switching gear, electrical supply and the metro stations and it secured the contract largely on its ability to deliver high quality projects on time, on budget and fit for purhref="https://lgfwz.com/zh-hk/tags-nw6e-0.html" target="_blank" >pose. Engineering Co did not submit the lowest tender for the project but the client was convinced of its technical and managerial capabilities which have given it a clear competitive advantage. The company enjoys a strong industry reputation and for engineering and management graduates, it is an ‘employer of choice’ as it is widely regarded as having one of the best graduate development programmes in Britain. Engineering Co is essentially a project-based organisation but its structure is nominally a combination of functional and divisional units. There is a clear division between planning and execution in Engineering Co and while strategy is ‘owned’ by the senior management team, the majority of the work is delivered through project teams.
Phil Jones is only thirty years of age but he is seen as having senior management potential and has been given leadership of one of the key project teams. Phil is based in Surrey, close to London, and he travels frequently throughout the UK to meet project team members and he is on-site in the Gulf every six-to-eight weeks but crucially, he is the only one in the team who has met the other members face-to-face. The project is still at the planning stage of the work and it has gone reasonably well up to now but Phil believes that performing ‘reasonably well’ means it is operating sub-optimally and that is not good enough; Phil wants it to be an exceptional team and he is determined to drive it towards that objective. The project team members were all internal applicants and Phil was given the final say on who would be recruited to the team. There was a significant number of internal applicants and the selection process was exhaustive, with each member being selected across a range of competencies. Phil was certain that he had the right people with the rights skills in the right jobs at the right time but six months into the project, he senses undercurrents of tension amongst team members. In several instances team members have agreed with each other and it seems to Phil that they are doing this to avoid any overt conflict. Phil is not going out of his way to generate conflict but he believes that a certain level of it would be good for the team as it might bring some of the undercurrents into the open where they could be acknowledged and addressed and which might allow the team to develop into a more effective and efficient unit.
Phil is angry at the way it is going for he feels he is losing focus on the project as his time is increasingly being taken up with ‘people issues’, an area where he is the first to admit his strengths do not lie. Some of the issues Phil has had to deal with include team members stating that they are still not 100% sure of their role in the team and consequently work has been duplicated and that has cost the project time and money. Phil was pretty sure everything would somehow have fallen into place as at first people appeared to be committed to the project and the team. He thought he had made the immediate project goals clear and he assumed everyone knew what it was they had to as he thought he had given the team clear boundaries. Phil has also found that there are cultural issues around authority and responsibility and when it comes to decision-making, several team members look to him to make the calls. This irritates Phil as he has told people repeatedly that they are empowered to make decisions and they must stop referring every problem back up the line, but several team members countered that they are unsure of what they can make decisions on and that Phil is inconsistent, telling people to be pro-active and then overruling them later.
Phil is a problem-solver and he decided that the best course of action was to get some books on teams and groups to gain insights into what teams are, how they function and to gain a better understanding of some of the dysfunctional aspects of teams. Initially, Phil approached these issues as an engineer; the team is a system and if the problems are analysed dispassionately the analysis will generate solutions which should be accepted by everyone as they are the outcome of a rational decision-making process. Phil takes comfort in certainty and he wishes at times that people would just act rationally and accept his decisions as they are based on what is best for the project. Grudgingly, Phil has come to the view that he is a mini HR Manager first and a Project Team - Leader second and the project team is in danger of losing focus and momentum. Phil read Bruce Tuckman’s stages of group development with interest and he is now convinced that the team is stuck at the storming stage and he is unsure of what has to be done to get it to the performing stage. He is desperate for the team to succeed, not only for his own career. Phil wants all of the team members to be able to look back on their time on the project team as a positive experience and he wants people to be proud to have on their CV that they were part of the Gulf Metro Project Team.
-
國小畢業寄語簡短(精彩多篇)
國小畢業留言寄語篇一1、親愛的朋友請握一握手,從此以後要各奔東西。2、綻放最絢爛的笑容,給明天更美的夢。3、如果我能,我願將心底的一切都揉進今日的分別。但是我不能啊!那麼,就讓以沉默分手吧!要知道,這是一座火山的沉默,它勝過一切話別!4、我的朋友們,我們要暫時分別...
-
經驗材料:“四點”同向發力 落實防止干預司法“三個規定”
經驗材料:“四點”同向發力落實防止干預司法“三個規定”XX監獄不斷壓實主體責任,將嚴格執行防止干預司法“三個規定”,作為清廉監獄建設重點內容,在內部防線、外部環境、執法空間、制度籠子等四個方面同向發力,推動“三個規定”落實工作走深走實。一、加強教育引導...
-
《烏塔》教學反思【精品多篇】
《烏塔》教學設計篇一教學內容:人教版第十冊第七課學生視角:一個十四歲的德國小姑娘,獨自一人遊歐洲,這對沒出過遠門的中國小朋友來説,是一件不敢想的事。基於這種想法,學生必會以獨特的思維,以讚揚或批評的態度來閲讀這篇課文。教師思考:任何事情都要辯論地看,尤其是這...
-
經驗做法:四步“廉”動持續推動廉潔文化建設
經驗做法:四步“廉”動持續推動廉潔文化建設為全面貫徹落實黨的二十大、二十屆中央紀委三次全會有關加強新時代廉潔文化建設的相關要求,穩步推進x集團“崇德善建尚廉築基”的廉潔文化理念見行見效,x公司紀委通過健全機制“強廉”、廉政教育“醒廉”、搭建載體“育...
相關文章
- Lesson20 The Spring Festival Is Coming!説課稿2篇
- PEP四年級上冊Unit2 My schoolbag Let’s spell 教學案例
- 10 Tips on Chinese Table Manners
- 《Unit 5 What does he do? Part A Let’s learn》 教材分析與處理
- Air Quality Devices - Marketing Research Proposal
- Unit 6 How many? Part ALet’s learn & Let’s chant教學設計
- This is my father 教學設計Lesson one
- Unit 3 The sentence patterns of Comparative Degree 同級比較句型(微課)
- Cultivate students' good English learning habits,Improve the effectiveness of classroom teachin
- A comparison of Chinese and Korean dining etiquette 中韓飲食禮儀之比較