北大夏令營自薦信(精選多篇)

第一篇：北大夏令營通知

關於舉辦2014年全國優秀大學生夏令營”活動的通知

發佈時間:2014-04-28 閱讀次數:4292

爲了促進我國高校優秀大學生之間的交流，增進青年學生對化學學科學習和研究的興趣，北京大學化學與分子工程學院（以下簡稱北大化學學院）從2014年開始舉辦每年一度的“全國優秀大學生夏令營”活動。幾年來，這項活動逐步成爲全國高校優秀大學生了解北大化學院的重要途徑，受到各地大學生的廣泛關注。作爲北大化學學院在“2014國際化學年”組織的一項重要活動，北大化學學院2014年“全國優秀大學生夏令營”活動將於2014年7月7日到7月9日在北京大學舉行。本次夏令營活動擬招收營員230人，北大化學學院自即日起受理營員報名申請。

2014年夏令營的主要活動包括：1) 北大化學學院各二級學科（研究所、研究中心）負責人向營員介紹本學科的歷史、現狀與發展趨勢並回答營員提出的相關問題；2) 組織營員參觀重點實驗室並與在學本科生、研究生座談、交流；

3) 北大化學學院在營員中進行本院2014年免試研究生選拔工作（具體的筆試、面試安排等信息以及北京大學化學院2014年研究生招生信息隨後發佈）。

除來自北京地區高校的營員需自行解決住宿問題外，北大化學學院爲所有營員免費提供夏令營期間在京的食宿，併爲來自外地學校的學生憑票報銷往返硬座火車票。

爲方便同學們報名申請，現將本次夏令營活動的有關事項通知如下。

一、申請資格

申請營員的同學須同時具備以下條件：

1、大學在校三年級（2014年畢業）學生；

2、對化學領域的科學研究有濃厚的興趣；

3、本科前兩年半學習成績在全年級排名居前20％（在其他方面有突出表現的學生可以適當放寬排名限制），必修課成績均爲及格以上，英語水平良好。在錄取營員時，優先考慮綜合性大學化學專業的學生及有志於進行與材料、物理、生物等交叉學科研究的學生。

二、申請材料

申請材料包括以下3類：

1、申請表、個人陳述、專家推薦信2封；

2、成績單（可自己打印，如有不實將取消錄取資格）與總評成績排名證

明；

3、其它證明材料（體現個人學術水平的有代表性的學術論文的複印件，各類獲獎證書複印件，英語四、六級證書複印件等）。

三、申請材料的寄送、審覈及營員的錄取

申請材料要統一使用a4紙；要把申請材料裝入a4大信封；信封正面寫清申請者姓名、所在學校及院系。

所有申請材料應於2014年6月10日前寄到（建議使用有寄達通知的郵寄方式）或送達北京大學化學學院研究生教務辦公室。申請材料的審覈及營員的錄取工作由北大化學院夏令營委員會負責。營員錄取名單將於2014年6月20日前在北大化學院的主頁上公佈。營員錄取通知以e-mail形式直接發給申請者本人。屆時未接到錄取通知的同學皆爲未入選者。未入選者不再另行通知。

歡迎踊躍報名申請，歡迎來電來函諮詢！

諮詢電話：010-6275-1713 李老師

夏令營信箱：

材料郵寄地址：北京大學化學學院研究生教務辦公室李娜老師收郵編100871

特此通知。

北京大學化學學院

2014年4月28日

附件1： 申請表

附件2：個人陳述表

附件3：專家推薦信

第二篇：北大夏令營導師推薦

推薦信

尊敬的北京大學信息科學院領導：

你們好！

在這裏我將我最優秀的學生侯道海同學推薦給貴校。侯道海同學知識技能過硬，有着較高的科學文化及道德品行素質。我希望這封信可以讓貴校更好地瞭解學生的實際情況，並能夠讓侯道海同學進入北京大學信息科學院夏令營得到鍛鍊，讓其得到更高一層的發展，進一步走向社會，建設社會。

最早接觸侯道海同學時，他留給我的最大印象就是他敢說敢做的自信。“總有一天，我也可以去超越年級前三甲。”兩年來，隨着我對他了解的深入，我發現他真的按照自己當初的誓言去做——將自己培養得更好。每次他取得一點微小的進步，都會無比高興，並將這種進步的喜悅轉化爲不竭的動力。在他的眼神中，透露出一種優秀戰略家所具有的高度自信，一種讓人心生敬畏的自信。

而更難得的是，這樣一個自信的學生，做起事來按部就班，一絲不苟。他把活動的每一條都列的非常詳細，但又不至於繁瑣，讓每個人的職務逐條細化，使得活動開展的效率非常高。

其實，在這個學生身上還有一個閃光點，就是他純淨的靈魂。他的興趣非常廣泛：數學、物理、書法、信息、繪畫、閱讀、寫作等等。每次校園舉行藝術節、文化節，他都要上交作品，最高的一次他一個人便攬下了四個項目，而且全部獲獎，在校園展出，被班裏的同學親切地稱爲“才神爺”。

不得不說，這個學生的身上真的有許多一般人所不具備的品質。我相信，如果得到更好的栽培，這個學生的才能必將更好的施展。我衷心的祝願他可以通過貴校的選拔，也希望貴校能給他一次機會。

此致

敬禮

2014級11班

班主任：

年月日

第三篇：北大保研夏令營申請表

health care financing and management

syllabus, spring 2014, yan feng

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

health care financing and management

hsbc business school peking university instructor: feng, yan

room407, building c, hsbc business school

class hours: april 25th to june 24th

tuesdays and fridays

3:30pm-5:20pm

classroom: c102

office hours: wednesdays 2:00pm-4:00pm, or by appointment.

teaching assistant: tbd

1. course overview arrow highlighted the prevalence of uncertainty in health care markets: physicians are

uncertain about how to treat patients, especially when medical technology is changing so rapidly; patients are uncertain about the effectiveness of medical treatment; and consumers and health plans are uncertain about the appropriateness and quality of providers’ services.

economic models explain some but by no means all consumer and producer behaviors in the medical services sector, and as for making health care policies, the economic concept of efficiency is a helpful criterion but not the only criterion for judging the desirability of alternative arrangement (e.g., distributions and redistributions). given the uneasy balance of efficiency and equality/equity, there is by no means a best health care system suitable for every society, which is especially true for a developing economy like china. in this class we will discuss why standard economic models of behavior and efficiency sometimes work and matter and sometimes do not in this industry. we are going to discuss the available information related but not limited to the following questions: do people behave in ways that are or could be made to be efficient (and equitable)? how much inefficiency is there in this industry and what are the causes? how is health care usually financed in a society? and how might a country better manage its resources dedicated to improving the health of its population?

the main context of this course is: (1) to consider the economic analysis of the medical care sector, namely how medical care is provided and financed; (2) to explore the implication of market failures in health care market such as moral hazard, adverse selection, and externality; and (3) to help you get informed with the making of health policies and how different health system evolved and developed, and also to discuss various reform ideas.

comments and questions in class are strongly encouraged. things that seem confusing or controversial are usually that way for many students; everyone will benefit if you ask questions. and because the class will deal with policy, there is a lot of room for honest feedback and constructive disagreement. no one knows the complete answer, or even the right answer, to many of the questions that will be raised in the classes. we do not set out to find the perfect answers, in different context, a solution may have quite ambiguous delivery and effect. however, if you do not think you can tolerate the fact that most of the discussion will be from the point of view of economists and will seem to be somewhat detached (that is, not from the point of view of a beneficiary or a kind-hearted philanthropist), then you probably shouldn’t be taking this class. 2. course requirements requirements ? students are suggested and expected to read all assigned readings or notes before each class; ??any submitted work should be typed, using 12-pitch font size and times new roman or arial type (no fancy fonts, please), double-spaced, and with no more than one-inch margins; submitted work can be hard copies (dropped in my mailbox before deadlime) or electronic versions, attention to english grammar and clarity of writing

are expected;

??assignments, if any, are expected to be turned in before deadline. late submission will be graded as “0” unless permission from the professor is granted in advance

under special circumstances.

coursework

there is no regular homework for this class, but you will be requested to write a term paper on a health topic that is of interest to you, it does not have to be an academic research paper. the paper should be at least 8 pages long (single-sided), but not exceeding 12 pages. you

may use materials from the class, journal articles, magazine and newspaper articles, and the internet to support your argument in your paper, but there should be no copying and pasting from the original materials. the format should be consistent with the course requirement. the deadline for turning in the paper is june 28th, 5:30pm sharp.

grading(tentative)

class participation

term paper

midterm exam (closed book)

final exam (closed book)

3. course materials 10% 30% 30% 30%

students are not required to buy books for this class. however, i do recommend 2 books as reference. coming to the classes prepared and taking necessary notes will be the most efficient and beneficial way of acquiring a broad and systematic understanding of the topics. 2

recommended books

? charles e. phelps, health economics, addison-wesley series in economics, 4th edition, 2014

??sherman folland, allen goodman, and miron stano, the economics of health and health care, prentice hall, 6th edition, 2014

in addition, “handbook of health economics”, edited by a.j. culyer and joseph p

newhouse (volume a and b, elsevier science, 2014, will be a great reference if you are seriously interested in research in health care related issues.

additional readings

readings are listed for each topic, all of which are strongly recommended for the students to master the comprehensive original discussion.

4. class schedule

due to the scheduled amount of teaching hours, in this class, we will be covering the most basic and most important topics, which include several subtopics. there may be certain topics not covered during this time period that you are interested to know, i suggest the students to find the answers in the reading materials and the books, and to utilize other public sources for updated debates regarding health care issues.

topic 1 introduction: what’s different about medical care? overview of the

health care market

readings

arrow, kenneth, 1963, "uncertainty and the welfare economics of

medical care," the american economic review 53(5): 941-973.

the demand for medical care and health topic 2

readings

grossman, michael, 1972, "on the concept of health capital and the

demand for health," the journal of political economy 80(2): 223-255.

dardanoni, valentino and adam wagstaff, 1987, "uncertainty,

inequalities in health and the demand for health," journal of health

economics 6: 283-290. (a simpler version of the grossman model is

presented in this article. you may want to read this article first).

porter, michael e. 2014, “what is value in health care?” new england

journal of medicine 363:2477-2481.3

topic 3

topic 4 mushkin, selma, 1962, "health as an investment," the journal of political economy 70(5):129-157. ellen o'brien, 2014, "employers' benefits from workers' health insurance," the milbank quarterly 81(1):ncing health care: health insurance, risk pooling and moral hazardreadings pauly, mark, 1968, "the economics of moral hazard," the american economic review 58(3): ing, willard et a1. 1987, "health insurance and the demand for medical care," the american economic review 77(3): hauser, richard, 1970, "medical insurance: a case study of trade- off between risk spreading and appropriate incentives," journal of economic theory 2(1): tt, richard n. and lien-fu huang, 1973, "the effect of health insurance on the demand for medical care," the journal of political economy 81(2): 281- or, martin et al., 2014, "are invisible hands good hands? moral hazard, competition, and the second-best in health care markets," the journal of political economy 108(5): ich, isaac and gary becker, 1972, "market insurance, self-insurance, and self-protection," the journal of political economy 80(4): ncing health care: individual and group health insurance,

asymmetric information and risk selection

readings

akerlof, george, 1970, "the market for lemons," the quarterly journal of economics 84(3): 488-500.

cutler, david and richard zeckhauser, 2014, "the anatomy of health

insurance," in handbook of health economics, vol. 1a, chapter 11: 606- 629 only.

rothschild, michael and joseph stiglitz, 1976, "equilibrium in

competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information,"the quarterly journal of economics 90(4): 629-650.

topic 5

topic 6 frank, richard g., jacob glazer, and thomas g. mcguire, 2014, "measuring adverse selection in managed health care," journal of health economics 19:829–ncing health care: health care and the public sectorreadings cutler, david, 2014, "health care and the public sector," in handbook of public economics, vol. 4, chapter 31(except for sections 5&8)er, david and jonathan gruber, 1996, "does public insurance crowd out private insurance?" the quarterly journal of economics 111(2):391- y, mark, 1974, "overinsurance and public provision of insurance: the roles of moral hazard and adverse selection, " the quarterly journal of economics 88(1): supply of medical care: asymmetric information and agency,

hospitals and physicians

readings

goldstein, gerald and mark pauly, 1976, "group health insurance as a

local public good," in the role of health insurance in the health

services sector, ed. rosett, nber.

pauly, mark, 1995, "paying physicians as agents: fee for service,

capitation or hybrids?" in health care policy and regulation. kluwer, ed. t. abbott, ch9: 163-174.

ellis, randall and thomas mcguire, 1990, "optimal payment systems

for health services," journal of health economics 9:375-396.

mcguire, thomas and mark pauly, 1991, "physician response to fee

changes with multiple payers," journal of health economics 10(4): 385- 410.

pauly, mark and michael redisch, 1973, "the not-for-profit hospital as a physicians' co-operative," the american economic review 63(1): 87-

100.

newhouse, joseph, 1970, "toward a theory of nonprofit institutions: an economic model of a hospital," the american economic review 60(1):

64-74.

topic 7 topic 8 dranove, david, 1988, "pricing by non-profit institutions: the case of hospital cost-shifting," journal of health economics 7(1): market for pharmaceuticalsreadings scherer, f. m., 2014, "the pharmaceutical industry," in handbook of health economics, vol. 1b, chapter owski, henry and john vernon, 2014, "the determinants of pharmaceutical research and development expenditures," journal of evolutionary economics 10:, margaret, 2014, "pharmaceutical price controls and entry strategies," working tenberg, frank, 1998, "pharmaceutical innovation, mortality reduction, and economic growth," nber working paper tenberg, frank r. and tomas j. philipson, 2014, "the dual effects of intellectual property regulations: within- and between-patent competition in the u.s. pharmaceuticals industry, " journal of law and economics 45(2): th system reforms readings

burton a. weisbrod, 1991, "the health care quadrilemma: an essay on technological change, insurance, quality of care, and cost

containment," journal of economic literature 29(2):523-552.

cutler, david, 2014, "equality, efficiency, and market fundamentals: the dynamics of international medical-care reform," journal of economic

literature 40(3): 881-906.

diamond, peter, 1992, "organizing the health insurance market,"

econometrica 60(6): 1233-1254.

5. important dates

term paper due: 5:30pm june 28th

midterm: may 24th

final: tbd

6

第四篇：北大資源學院夏令營

2014年北大資源學院夏令營規則

爲了搞好2014年夏令營活動，提高家長學生的對本次活動的認知程度，進一步提大學聯考生對北大資源學院的認識，使考生渡過一個愉快的假期，制定本規則。

一、入營條件

1、必須是本年度的考生，必須是購卡者，否則不予考慮

2、初步人數確定爲50人左右

3、購卡者必須在購卡處登記造冊（考分待查詢後登記）

4、原則上，只讓學生入營，但個別家長要去，只准許一個家長去。倆個家長同時去的，必須有一個自費。

4、學校將根據實際登記情況，選擇入營學生

二、夏令營旅行路線

新泰——北京。屆時，將有巴士帶領全團人員進京。考生到京，請家長和學生帶好學生證、身份證等有效證件及履行必需品。

在京活動由學校負責安排。到京後，自由活動者，費用自理。

三、本規則自發布之日起實施，解釋權屬學校組織方。

北大資源學院歡迎你，謝謝！

qq:420145436

2014年5月7日

第五篇：北大 自薦信

(一篇好範文帶來更多輕鬆：)

湛楊夢曉同學自薦材料

尊敬的北大招生辦領導：

您好！

我叫湛楊夢曉，男，17歲。我來自於藍墨水的上游，美麗的汨羅江畔。現就讀於汨羅一中高三年級409班。

民主與科學，是北大高擎的兩面飄揚的旗幟，也是當今學子所應堅持的。我有幸生活在這樣一個偉大的時代，一個允許我們擁有自由與獨立思考的時代。於是，我深深思索，怎樣才能不辜負了這樣的一個時代？

年少揚帆，志存高遠

周恩來總理年少曾高呼“爲中華之崛起而讀書”。而今日之中華，不少學子卻只爲一己私利，企求一生無憂。倘若人人都如此，偌大的新中國又靠誰來建設？於是我始終以爲社會貢獻自己的力量爲己任，努力提升自己的修養，嚴格要求自己。並且充分發揮自己外向、號召力強的特點，經常與同學們聊時政熱點，做他們的思想工作，力求與他們一同進步，樹立社會責任感。

在家中，我孝敬父母，體貼他們的辛苦，生活上不提過分的要求，承擔力所能及的勞動。在學校，老師除了是我的師長，更是我的朋友。由於外向，我與老師關係十分融洽。生活中，我與同學和睦相處，共同進步，把自己的快樂分享給每個人。同時，我也始終放飛自己愛的孔明燈，照耀每個需要光明的人。在無情的災難來臨，傷害我們的同胞之際，我總是號召大家爲災區捐款。將自己的愛，通過這微薄的零用錢，傳遞給災區人民。因爲表現突出，我多次被學校評爲“三好學生”、“優秀學生”，並在2014年和2014年分別被評爲汨羅市級“三好學生”和“優秀學生幹部”。

追求真理，刻苦求知

學習是通往真理的捷徑，也是通向完美的必由之路。我享受追求知識的過程,並將學習當做一種漫遊，將學習中所遇到的困難全當做沿途美妙的風景。

我是一個學得挺活的學生。我從不將學習成績的提高寄託在題海戰術之上。我甚至寧願放棄一些容易且重複的題，而去做那些新穎的題型。學習，本就是方法的積累和應用，太多次數的重複反而毫無必要。另外，我特別愛問問題，尤其是在物理科上，除了課本上的知識，我總喜歡纏着物理老師，去了解更多的有關物理學史上的有趣事件。興趣是最好的老師，我對理科的極大熱情也換來了我理科各個科目極佳的成績。我的成績始終穩居年級前列。並在2014年獲得湖南省高中化學聯賽省級三等獎，物理、數學聯賽均獲岳陽市一等獎，生物競賽榮獲岳陽市三等獎。

特色發展，綜合優化

從小，我就對各類科技非常感興趣。我可以看一個人修拖拉機，看一下午，然後去思考那臺拖拉機壞在哪裏，並嘗試用自己學到的知識來猜測造成這個故障的原因，以及這個故障該如何修復。進入高中，瞭解到有關半導體之類的知識，我對這樣新奇的知識簡直着迷了，到處找老師瞭解有關的知識，並嘗試將自己家的收音機拆開觀察構造。

同時，我的理性思維也特別強，總想用學到的知識來解釋生活中的現象，當在教材裏看到有關閃電的成因時，我興奮得跳了起來。而與同學們聊天時，我也老愛聊一些從雜誌或報紙上看到的前沿科學的知識。當讀到先子理論、量子理性

之類的文章，我簡直是想要手之舞之足之蹈之了！我也不只滿足書本上的知識，我愛自己探究一些新的知識，爲此，老師、同學也戲稱我爲“怪才”。（後文附有我的一點獨到思考，拜請老師一閱。）

我深知，新時期的我們絕不能再做一味死讀書的書呆子。

《哲學生活》中，着重講了一個知識點——實踐是認識的基礎。作爲當今社會的青年，我們又怎能閉門造車？高中三年，我不忘投身於社會實踐，時時關注社會最新動態。針對汨羅市大量青壯年外出務工，家中兒童留守的現狀，我憂心忡忡，走訪調查，發放問卷，總結撰寫了調查報告——《汨羅市留守兒童現狀調查分析》。這份調查報告因爲真實地反映了社會現狀並且鞭辟入裏地進行了分析，被學校當做研究報告的典範，並被評爲汨羅市實踐活動一等獎。

我對籃球十分熱愛，學習之餘，我總喜歡去打籃球，既能鍛鍊身體，又能緩解學習帶來的壓力。籃球是個需要人全神貫注的運動，我不僅從中感受到了樂趣，更養成了對事物要百分百投入的習慣。

除籃球外，音樂也是我的一大嗜好。我很喜歡吉他這種樂器，我覺得吉他也有性格，就是不羈，我很喜歡這樣的隨意。所以我開始學習吉他，而且也較有天賦，在汨羅市的藝術節上獲得了器樂類一等獎。外向的性格和喜歡與人交流的特點也使我練就了非凡的口才，無論大型還是小型的演講，我都不怯場，敢於用幽默風趣的口才去感染大家、號召大家。我曾參加“希望杯“英語競賽，並獲得老師們的好評。

而飛翔更是我年少以來的一個夢，每次看到飛機從校園上空飛過，我都希望自己也能造出那樣神奇的事物。所以，我嘗試着利用有限的材料開始製作。儘管學習任務比較繁雜，我總抽出時間來對自己做的飛行器進行改造與再設計。繼我所參加的汨羅市青少年科技創新節“遙控飄移車競速“賽獲得二等獎後，我的飛行器也終於在我不斷改造下升空，獲得校一等獎。

爲夢奮鬥，永不言棄

我將對生活的熱情，對社會的責任，對學習的熱愛，化爲一個美麗且充滿希望的夢想，我希望北大能成爲我成就夢想的舞臺。“好風憑藉力，送我上青天！”我多麼渴望當我來敲門時，北大，您能敞開您寬闊的胸懷擁抱我！

湖南省汨羅市一中學生 湛楊夢曉

2014-12-19

附：

學虛數時，數學老師介紹，人們開始時認爲有理數就可以應對所有生產應用，但卻發現邊長爲1的正方形的對角線長度無法用有理數表示，所以數系擴充到了實數。而後來又發現核物理時要用到負數的平方根，所以數系擴充到了複數。我不禁想，當0作除數時，現在看來也無意義，那麼會不會也能擴充數系？後來學導數，我意識到，可以用趨近於0的數來作除數，也就是說可以定義一種具有除法性質的0來做除數，我將這命名爲“趨近數”。然後就是其實際意義了，我發現當一個對數函數的真數爲趨近1時，其值是趨近0的，我們且定義x→a=a′。那麼我們可以證得ln1'?0'（因爲令f(x)?

f'(1)?1?

lnxx

則f'(x)?

1?lnxx

，所以

lim

ln(1??x)?ln1(1??x)?1

lnx

?

ln1'0'

，即

lnx

ln1'0'

。利用這個，我們就可以很簡單?1）

?x?0

地得到：lim

x?1

x?1

?2，因爲

lim

x?1

x?1

?

ln1'0'

?

2ln1'0'

?2

0'0'

?2

，而若按照常規

辦法則必須構造一個函數然後將

lim

x?1

lnx

x?1看作是該函數在ｘ＝１時的導數來

做，顯然引入趨近數將減輕類似的計算。

科學也需要創造，需要幻想。這還只是我探索的開端，現在我的知識還很有限，無法將這個想法徹底的應用到實際中，我由衷地希望能在北大——這個鼓勵學子探索與追求的學府中與更多志同道合的友伴共同完善這個想法。