求職信34----外企.doc(精選多篇)

第一篇：外企如此看求職信

惠普：附求職信沒有必要

中國惠普有限公司人力資源總監說，附求職信沒有必要，我不知道求職信意味什麼。我們也看到過一些求職信，裏面有一些豪言壯語，一些很浪漫的話或表決心的話，什麼“給我一個支點，我將撬起地球”，“讓我們風雨同舟”，“給我一個機會，我會還你一個驚喜”。我覺得應聘者應該對症下藥，如果你去的是一個廣告公司，你比較有創意，文字比較華麗，可能會有一些幫助。而我們這兒是搞工程的，沒有必要搞這些東西。

富士通：有沒有求職信沒關係

富士通認爲不附求職信沒有什麼關係。因爲富士通看的是應聘者的條件符不符合職位的要求，如果求職者願意寫也沒有關係，但公司並不會因爲有無求職信而左右對應聘者的判斷。

歐萊雅：求職信作用不大

歐萊雅（中國）人力資源總監說，求職信的作用是不大的。人力資源部要處理大量的簡歷，我們的篩選標準是根據事實依據，比如看應聘者的教育程度、工作背景和專業水平等是否符合崗位需求，我們不會看重應聘者的語言措辭。

ｉｂｍ：寫得不好不如不寫

ｉｂｍ（中國）有限公司大中華區招聘經理說，求職信如果寫得好，確實能吸引注意力，附上也可，如果寫得不好那就不如不寫。一般求職信都是非常簡短地介紹一下自己的特點以及希望應聘的職位，還會有一些問候之類的話。以前這在國際上是非常通行的做法，在簡歷前面用很短的文字吸引招聘者的注意。但是，近幾年來我看到的從美國校園來的簡歷好像都沒有附求職信。一般都是一個ｅ—ｍａｉｌ，然後寫上幾句話，附上一份自己的簡歷，僅此而已。

微軟：不強調附求職信

微軟並不強調附求職信，關鍵看應聘者如何在求職信中介紹自己。如果要附上求職信，一定要在上面很清楚地說明自己的特點，羅列出自己的強項，以及可以引起主考官或面試人員興奮的東西，如果求職者很泛泛地寫了一封求職信，那麼很容易就會被翻過去直接看簡歷了，起不到求職信真正的作用。

第二篇：外企求職信特點及要求

外企求職信有什麼特點及要求呢?

(1)外企求職信一般要用外語寫，主要是英語，或準備好中、英文兩份材料。寫求職信的過程本身也就反映出了你的外語水平，故應儘量做到語言規範、符合外文習慣，減少語法錯誤。

(2)求職信要有針對性。針對不同企業不同職位，求職信的內容要有所變化，側重點有所不同，使對方覺得你的經歷和素質與所聘職位要求相一致，因爲外企招聘所需要的不是最好的員工，而是最適合其所聘工作的人。

(3)外企求職信中不要流露出不自信的思想，外企忌諱的是不自信，這與中國傳統的“謙虛是美德”略有不同，在寫外企求職信中，不必太謙虛，應充分強調啓己的長處和技能，對自己較重要的經歷和實踐要較詳細的敘述。

(4)要本着誠實不欺的原由，不能無中生有，自吹自擂。因爲西方人認爲誠實守信是一個人的第一美德。有一個外企應聘者在寫求職信中寫到自己愛好興趣時，寫了喜歡旅遊和賽艇，其人實際上很少外出，對賽艇更是一無所知，但爲了以具有冒險精神及刺激性的形象吸引外企招聘者故意加了這兩條。結果在後來面試中，主試者談到自己也是個賽艇愛好者，但對賽艇轉彎技術卻不甚瞭解，想與該應聘者切磋。應聘者立即面紅耳赤，手足無措，不由得不承認其對賽艇一無所知。主試者不滿其弄虛作假立即拒絕錄用他。

(5)在寫外企求職信中，經注意寫“怎麼幹”這比”幹什麼”更重要。比如你擔任過校學生會主席，不要光寫頭銜，更重要的是你是如何擔任這個職位的，組織了哪些活動，有什麼成績，怎麼組織這些活動，達到既定目標。因爲外企重視的不是你的身份，而是你如何在所任職位上發揮你的才能，他們大都以此來判斷你的能力和潛力是否能勝任其所聘職位的工作。

一般求職信是自我描繪的立體畫像，是求職的第一階段，其目的同個人大學生個人簡歷一樣，主要是引起招聘者的注意爭取面試機會，但同個人大學生個人簡歷又略有不同，求職信是針對特定的個人而寫，而大學生個人簡歷的寫作卻是針對特定的工作崗位，求職信可以說是對大學生個人簡歷的補充和概述。

求職信一般由三部分組成：開頭、主體和結尾。開頭部分包括稱呼和引言，稱呼要恰當，引言的主要作用是儘量引起對方的興趣看完你的材料，並自然進入主題部分，開頭要人注目，說明應聘緣由和目的。

主體部分是求職信的重點，簡明扼要並有針對性地概述自己的大學生個人簡歷內容，突出自己的特點，並努力使自己的描敘與所求職位要求一致，切勿誇大其辭或不着邊際，外企招聘人員尤其重視這一點。

結尾部分要做到令人口味，把你想得到工作的迫切心情表達出來，請用人單位儘快答覆你並給予面試的機會，語氣要熱情、誠懇、有禮貌。

第三篇：外企面試的基本英語問題

外企面試的基本英語問題

1. why are you looking (or why did you leave you last job)?

this should be a straightforward question to answer, but it can trip you up. presumably you are looking for a new job (or any job) because you want to advance your career and get a position that allows you to grow as a person and an employee. it’s not a good idea to mention money here, it can make you sound mercenary. and if you are in the unfortunate situation of having been downsized, stay positive and be a***rief as pos***le about it. if you were fired, you’ll need a good explanation. but once again, stay positive.

2. tell me what you know about this company.

does your homework before you go to any interview? whether it’***eing the vp of marketing or the mailroom clerk, you should know about the company or business you’re going to work for. has this company been in the news lately? who are the people in the company you should know about? does the background work, it will make you stand out as someone who comes prepared, and is genuinely interested in the company and the job.

3. why do you want to work at x company?

this should be directly related to the last question. any research you’ve done on the company should have led you to the conclusion that you’d want to work there. after all, you’re at the interview, right? put some thought into this answer before you have your interview, mention your career goals and highlight forward-thinking goals and career plans.

4. what relevant experience do you have?

hopefully if you’re applying for this position you have bags of related experience, and if that’s the case you should mention it all. but if you’re switching careers or trying something a little different, your experience may initially not look like it’s matching up. that’s when you need a little honest creativity to match the experiences required with the ones you have. people skills are people skills after all, you just need to show how customer service skills can apply to internal management positions, and so on.

5. if your previous co-workers were here, what would they say about you?

ok, this is not the time for full disclosure. if some people from your past are going to say you’re a boring a-hole, you don’t need to bring that up. stay positive, always, and maybe have a few specific quotes in mind. “they’d say i was a hard worker” or even better “john doe has always said i was the most reliable, creative problem-solver he’d ever met.”

6. have you done anything to further your experience?

this could include anything from night classes to hobbies and sports. if it’s related, it’s worth mentioning. obviously anything to do with further education is great, but maybe you’re spending time on a home improvement project to work on skills such as self-sufficiency, time management and motivation.

7. where else have you applied?

this is a good way to hint that you’re in demand, without sounding like you’re whoring yourself all over town. so, be honest and mention a few other companies but don’t go into detail. the fact that you’re seriously looking and keeping your options open is what the interviewer is driving at.

8. how are you when you’re working under pressure?

once again, there are a few ways to answer this***but they should all be positive. you may work well under pressure, you may thrive under pressure, and you may actually prefer working under pressure. if you say you crumble like aged blue cheese, this is not going to help you get

your foot in the door.

9. what motivates you to do a good job?

the answer to this one is not money, even if it is. you should be motivated by life’s noble pursuits. you want recognition for a job well done. you want to become better at your job. you want to help others or be a leader in your field.

10. what’s your greatest strength?

this is your chance to shine. you’re being asked to explain why you are a great employee, so don’t hold back and stay do stay positive. you could be someone who thrives under pressure, a great motivator, an amazing problem solver or someone with extraordinary attention to detail. if your greatest strength. however, is to drink anyone under the table or get a top score on mario kart, keep it to you? the interviewer is looking for work-related strengths.

11. what’s your biggest weakness?

if you’re completely honest, you may be kicking yourself in the butt. if you say you don’t have one, you’re obviously lying. this is a horrible question and one that politicians have become masters at answering. they say things like “i’m perhaps too committed to my work and don’t spend enough time with my family.” oh, there’s a fineable offense. i’ve even heard “i think i’m too good at my job, it can often make people jealous.” please, let’s keep our feet on the ground. if you’re asked this question, give a small, work-related flaw that you’re working hard to improve. example: “i’ve been told i occasionally focus on details and miss the bigger picture, so i’ve been spending time laying out the complete project every day to see my overall progress.”

12. let’s talk about salary. what are you looking for?

run for cover! this is one tricky game to play in an interview. even if you know the salary range for the job, if you answer first you’re already showing all your cards. you want as much as pos***le, the employer wants you for as little as you’re willing to take. before you apply, take a look at for a good idea of what someone with your specific experience should be paid. you may want to say, “well, that’s something i’ve thought long and hard about and i think someone with my experience should get between x & y.” or, you could be sly and say, “right now, i’m more interested in talking more about what the position can offer my career.” that could at least buy you a little time to scope out the situation. but if you do have a specific figure in mind and you are confident that you can get it, i’d say go for it. i have on many occasions, and every time i got very close to that figure (both below and sometimes above).

13. are you good at working in a team?

unless you have the i.q. of a houseplant, you’ll always answer yes to this one. it’s the only answer. how can anyone function inside an organization if they are a loner? you may want to mention what part you like to play in a team though; it’s a great chance to explain that you’re a natural leader.

14. tell me a suggestion you have made that was implemented.

it’s important here to focus on the word “implemented.” there’s nothing wrong with having a thousand great ideas, but if the only place they live is on your notepad what’s the point? better still, you need a good ending. if your previous company took your advice and ended up going bankrupt, that’s not such a great example either. be prepared with a story about an idea of yours that was taken from idea to implementation, and considered successful.

15. has anything ever irritated you about people you’ve worked with?

of course, you have a list as long as your arm. but you can’t say that, it shows you a***eing

negative and difficult to work with. the best way to answer this one is to think for a while and then say something like “i’ve always got on just fine with my co-workers actually.”

use this question (本站 推薦)as a chance to show that you are a team player: “the only people i have trouble with are those who aren’t team players, who just don’t perform, who complain constantly, and who fail to respond to any efforts to motivate them.” the interviewer is expecting a response focused on personality and personal dislikes. surprise her by delivering an answer that reflects company values

16. is there anyone you just could not work with?

no. well, unless you’re talking about murderers, racists, rapists, thieves or other dastardly characters, you can work with anyone. otherwise you could be flagged as someone who’s picky and difficult if you say, “i can’t work with anyone who’s a bronco’s fan. sorry.”

17. tell me about any issues you’ve had with a previous***boss.

if you fall for this one you shouldn’t be hired anyway. the interviewer is testing you to see if you’ll speak badly about your previous supervisor. simply answer this question with extreme tact, diplomacy and if necessary, a big fat loss of memory. in short, you’ve never had any issues.

the answer to 18 is completely wrong. i am a director at a major media company’s interactive division. our company is expanding and i am almost in a constant state of hiring. i ask a variation of this question in every single interview and if a candidate has never had one issue or disagreement with anyone, (i stated a variation: i ask if it has happened with anyone in the workplace) i peg them as a liar and reject them immediately.

i went well with my previous***boss. if there is a conflict, i will be open mind and talk about facts. once decision is made, i execute it well.

18. would you rather work for money or job satisfaction?

it’s not a very fair question is it? we’d all love to get paid a trump-like salary doing a job we love but that’s rare indeed. it’s fine to say money is important, but remember that nothing is more important to you than the job. otherwise, you’re just someone looking for a bigger paycheck.

19. would you rather be liked or feared?

i have been asked this a lot, in various incarnations. the first time i just drew a blank and said, “i don’t know.” that went over badly, but it was right at the start of my career when i had little to no experience. since then i’ve realized that my genuine answer is “neither, i’d rather be respected.” you don’t want to be feared because fear is no way to motivate a team. you may got the job done but at what cost? similarly, if you’re everyone’***best friend you’ll find it difficult to make tough decisions or hit deadlines. but when you’re respected, you don’t have to be a complete bastard or a lame duck to get the job done.

20. are you willing to put the interests of x company ahead of your own?

again, for another nasty question. if you say yes, you’re a corporate whore who doesn’t care about family. if you say no, you’re disloyal to the company. i’m afraid that you’ll probably have to say yes to this one though, because you’re trying to be the perfect employee at this point, and perfect employees don’t cut out early for jimmy’***a***all game.

it is situational. if you…; if you …. ethics and professionalism

21. so, explain why i should hire you.

as i’m sure you know, “because i’m great” or “i really need a job” are not good answers here. this is a time to give the employer a laundry list of your greatest talents that just so happen to match the job description. it’s also good to avoid taking potshots at other potential candidates here.

focus on yourself and your talents, not other people’s flaws.

22. finally, do you have any questions to ask me?

i’ll finish the way i started, with one of the most common questions asked in interviews. this directly relates to the research you’ve done on the company and also gives you a chance to show how eager and prepared you are. you’ll probably want to ask about benefits if they haven’t been covered already. a good generic one is “how soon could i start, if i were offered the job of course.” you may also ask what you’d be working on. specifically, in the role you’re applying for and how that affects the rest of the company. always have questions ready, greeting this one with a blank stare is a rotten way to finish your interview. good luck and happy job hunting.

ponder for a moment, and then ask your interviewer “what aspect of your job do you find most challenging”.

i would ask the interviewer, “why do you like to work here?”

23. where do you want to be in 5 to years?

they don’t want to hear in the same job you are interviewing for. ultimately, the hr people are searching for someone who can handle the job now, and has the potential to grow into a high level management job in the future. do you have those goals too?

第四篇：外企怎樣看待求職信

過去企業注重求職信中的表白，現在不是了，更看重個人條件是否符合職位要求。緣何如此，請看本文——

通常情況下，求職者在遞交簡歷總是喜歡附上一份熱情洋溢的求職信。那麼，外企怎樣看待求職信呢？

惠普：附求職信沒有必要

中國惠普有限公司人力資源總監說，附求職信沒有必要，我不知道求職信意味什麼。我們也看到過一些求職信，裏面有一些豪言壯語，一些很浪漫的話或表決心的話，什麼“給我一個支點，我將撬起地球”，“讓我們風雨同舟”，“給我一個機會，我會還你一個驚喜”。我覺得應聘者應該對症下藥，如果你去的是一個廣告公司，你比較有創意，文字比較華麗，可能會有一些幫助。而我們這兒是搞工程的，沒有必要搞這些東西。

富士通：有沒有求職信沒關係

富士通認爲不附求職信沒有什麼關係。因爲富士通看的是應聘者的條件符不符合職位的要求，如果求職者願意寫也沒有關係，但公司並不會因爲有無求職信而左右對應聘者的判斷。

歐萊雅：求職信作用不大

歐萊雅（中國）人力資源總監說，求職信的作用是不大的。人力資源部要處理大量的簡歷，我們的篩選標準是根據事實依據，比如看應聘者的教育程度、工作背景和專業水平等是否符合崗位需求，我們不會看重應聘者的語言措辭。

ｉｂｍ：寫得不好不如不寫

ｉｂｍ（中國）有限公司大中華區招聘經理說，求職信如果寫得好，確實能吸引注意力，附上也可，如果寫得不好那就不如不寫。一般求職信都是非常簡短地介紹一下自己的特點以及希望應聘的職位，還會有一些問候之類的話。以前這在國際上是非常通行的做法，在簡歷前面用很短的文字吸引招聘者的注意。但是，近幾年來我看到的從美國校園來的簡歷好像都沒有附求職信。一般都是一個ｅ—ｍａｉｌ，然後寫上幾句話，附上一份自己的簡歷，僅此而已。

微軟：不強調附求職信

微軟並不強調附求職信，關鍵看應聘者如何在求職信中介紹自己。如果要附上求職信，一定要在上面很清楚地說明自己的特點，羅列出自己的強項，以及可以引起主考官或面試人員興奮的東西，如果求職者很泛泛地寫了一封求職信，那麼很容易就會被翻過去直接看簡歷了，起不到求職信真正的作用。

禮來：求職信沒有多大意義

禮來公司人力資源總監說，我個人覺得求職信沒有太多意義。對公司來說，初步瞭解應聘者的最好工具就是簡歷，如果簡歷能夠充分體現應聘者的關鍵信息，這就足夠了。人力資源部每天收到大量求職簡歷，工作人員不可能花很長時間，在看完應聘者的簡歷後，還仔細地閱讀沒有更多新內容的求職信。我們會有自己的篩選技巧，會根據簡歷上的主要信息最後做出一個綜合判斷。現在的求職信中，有不少人喜歡誓言類的語句，比如“給我一片天空，我將怎麼怎麼樣”等，但事實上這樣的語言修辭並不能給招聘人員帶來什麼有效信息，公司不會關心這樣的目標，也不會因此而感動。

ｎｅｃ：附求職信是畫蛇添足

ｎｅｃ認爲，在求職簡歷中附上求職信沒有必要，是畫蛇添足。撰寫簡歷的主要目的就是應聘者把自己的個人信息傳遞給公司，投送簡歷本身就已經表明了求職者想加入這家公司的強烈願望。用較小的篇幅傳遞最大量的信息是最明智的，重要的是儘可能在簡歷的第一頁把最重要的信息傳達清楚。

西門子：不能千篇一律

求職信寫得好，是很有必要的。如果只是簡單寫一點，或者千篇一律，你抄我我抄你，或者是從網上下載下來的那種，參考價值就不大。應聘者如果一定要附上求職信的話，一定要抓住自己的“亮點”，如果人人都說自己團隊精神很好，怎麼勤奮學習、努力向上等，就沒有特別的意義，並不能突出某個應聘者自己的特點。

柯達：寫出閃光點很重要

柯達公司人事總監認爲，求職信應把應聘者的強項在第一頁寫出來，對於公司人力資源部的工作人員來說，才容易發現應聘者身上的閃光點。

第五篇：如何寫外企求職信

求職信是自我描繪的立體畫像，是求職的第一階段，其目的同個人簡歷一樣，主要是引起招聘者的注意爭取面試機會，但同個人簡歷又略有不同，求職信是針對特定的個人而寫，而簡歷的寫作卻是針對特定的工作崗位，求職信可以說是對簡歷的補充和概述。

求職信一般由三部分組成：開頭、主體和結尾。開頭部分包括稱呼和引言，稱呼要恰當，引言的主要作用是儘量引起對方的興趣看完你的材料，並自然進入主題部分，開頭要人注目，說明應聘緣由和目的。

主體部分是求職信的重點，簡明扼要並有針對性地概述自己的簡歷內容，突出自己的特點，並努力使自己的描敘與所求職位要求一致，切勿誇大其辭或不着邊際，外企招聘人員尤其重視這一點。

結尾部分要做到令人口味，把你想得到工作的迫切心情表達出來，請用人單位儘快答覆你並給予面試的機會，語氣要熱情、誠懇、有禮貌。同其它企業單位求職信相比，外企求職信有什麼特點及要求呢？

（1）外企求職信一般要用外語寫，主要是英語，或準備好中、英文兩份材料。寫求職信的過程本身也就反映出了你的外語水平，故應儘量做到語言規範、符合外文習慣，減少語法錯誤。

（2）求職信要有針對性。針對不同企業不同職位，求職信的內容要有所變化，側重點有所不同，使對方覺得你的經歷和素質與所聘職位要求相一致，因爲外企招聘所需要的不是最好的員工，而是最適合其所聘工作的人。

（3）外企求職信中不要流露出不自信的思想，外企忌諱的是不自信，這與中國傳統的“謙虛是美德”略有不同，在寫外企求職信中，不必太謙虛，應充分強調啓己的長處和技能，對自己較重要的經歷和實踐要較詳細的敘述。

（4）要本着誠實不欺的原由，不能無中生有，自吹自擂。因爲西方人認爲誠實守信是一個人的第一美德。有一個外企應聘者在寫求職信中寫到自己愛好興趣時，寫了喜歡旅遊和賽艇，其人實際上很少外出，對賽艇更是一無所知，但爲了以具有冒險精神及刺激性的形象吸引外企招聘者故意加了這兩條。結果在後來面試中，主試者談到自己也是個賽艇愛好者，但對賽艇轉彎技術卻不甚瞭解，想與該應聘者切磋。應聘者立即面紅耳赤，手足無措，不由得不承認其對賽艇一無所知。主試者不滿其弄虛作假立即拒絕錄用他。

（5）在寫外企求職信中，經注意寫“怎麼幹”這比”幹什麼”更重要。比如你擔任過校學生會主席，不要光寫頭銜，更重要的是你是如何擔任這個職位的，組織了哪些活動，有什麼成績，怎麼組織這些活動，達到既定目標。因爲外企重視的不是你的身份，而是你如何在所任職位上發揮你的才能，他們大都以此來判斷你的能力和潛力是否能勝任其所聘職位的工作。