The Assessment: Phil Jones’ Dilemma
The Assessment: Phil Jones’ Dilemma
Phil Jones is a project leader at Engineering Co and leader of a team operating in six different geographical locations across two time zones. Phil is a mechanical engineer and his technical skills have been recognised by Engineering Co and he has made steady progress with the company since leaving university.
Phil has been the Senior Project Team Leader for six months on a blue chip project, an integrated rail and metro system in the Gulf region of the Middle East. The project went out to global tender and Engineering Co won the contract for supplying rails, switching gear, electrical supply and the metro stations and it secured the contract largely on its ability to deliver high quality projects on time, on budget and fit for purhref="https://lgfwz.com/zh-sg/tags-nw6e-0.html" target="_blank" >pose. Engineering Co did not submit the lowest tender for the project but the client was convinced of its technical and managerial capabilities which have given it a clear competitive advantage. The company enjoys a strong industry reputation and for engineering and management graduates, it is an ‘employer of choice’ as it is widely regarded as having one of the best graduate development programmes in Britain. Engineering Co is essentially a project-based organisation but its structure is nominally a combination of functional and divisional units. There is a clear division between planning and execution in Engineering Co and while strategy is ‘owned’ by the senior management team, the majority of the work is delivered through project teams.
Phil Jones is only thirty years of age but he is seen as having senior management potential and has been given leadership of one of the key project teams. Phil is based in Surrey, close to London, and he travels frequently throughout the UK to meet project team members and he is on-site in the Gulf every six-to-eight weeks but crucially, he is the only one in the team who has met the other members face-to-face. The project is still at the planning stage of the work and it has gone reasonably well up to now but Phil believes that performing ‘reasonably well’ means it is operating sub-optimally and that is not good enough; Phil wants it to be an exceptional team and he is determined to drive it towards that objective. The project team members were all internal applicants and Phil was given the final say on who would be recruited to the team. There was a significant number of internal applicants and the selection process was exhaustive, with each member being selected across a range of competencies. Phil was certain that he had the right people with the rights skills in the right jobs at the right time but six months into the project, he senses undercurrents of tension amongst team members. In several instances team members have agreed with each other and it seems to Phil that they are doing this to avoid any overt conflict. Phil is not going out of his way to generate conflict but he believes that a certain level of it would be good for the team as it might bring some of the undercurrents into the open where they could be acknowledged and addressed and which might allow the team to develop into a more effective and efficient unit.
Phil is angry at the way it is going for he feels he is losing focus on the project as his time is increasingly being taken up with ‘people issues’, an area where he is the first to admit his strengths do not lie. Some of the issues Phil has had to deal with include team members stating that they are still not 100% sure of their role in the team and consequently work has been duplicated and that has cost the project time and money. Phil was pretty sure everything would somehow have fallen into place as at first people appeared to be committed to the project and the team. He thought he had made the immediate project goals clear and he assumed everyone knew what it was they had to as he thought he had given the team clear boundaries. Phil has also found that there are cultural issues around authority and responsibility and when it comes to decision-making, several team members look to him to make the calls. This irritates Phil as he has told people repeatedly that they are empowered to make decisions and they must stop referring every problem back up the line, but several team members countered that they are unsure of what they can make decisions on and that Phil is inconsistent, telling people to be pro-active and then overruling them later.
Phil is a problem-solver and he decided that the best course of action was to get some books on teams and groups to gain insights into what teams are, how they function and to gain a better understanding of some of the dysfunctional aspects of teams. Initially, Phil approached these issues as an engineer; the team is a system and if the problems are analysed dispassionately the analysis will generate solutions which should be accepted by everyone as they are the outcome of a rational decision-making process. Phil takes comfort in certainty and he wishes at times that people would just act rationally and accept his decisions as they are based on what is best for the project. Grudgingly, Phil has come to the view that he is a mini HR Manager first and a Project Team - Leader second and the project team is in danger of losing focus and momentum. Phil read Bruce Tuckman’s stages of group development with interest and he is now convinced that the team is stuck at the storming stage and he is unsure of what has to be done to get it to the performing stage. He is desperate for the team to succeed, not only for his own career. Phil wants all of the team members to be able to look back on their time on the project team as a positive experience and he wants people to be proud to have on their CV that they were part of the Gulf Metro Project Team.
-
国小毕业寄语简短(精彩多篇)
国小毕业留言寄语篇一1、亲爱的朋友请握一握手,从此以后要各奔东西。2、绽放最绚烂的笑容,给明天更美的梦。3、如果我能,我愿将心底的一切都揉进今日的分别。但是我不能啊!那么,就让以沉默分手吧!要知道,这是一座火山的沉默,它胜过一切话别!4、我的朋友们,我们要暂时分别...
-
经验材料:“四点”同向发力 落实防止干预司法“三个规定”
经验材料:“四点”同向发力落实防止干预司法“三个规定”XX监狱不断压实主体责任,将严格执行防止干预司法“三个规定”,作为清廉监狱建设重点内容,在内部防线、外部环境、执法空间、制度笼子等四个方面同向发力,推动“三个规定”落实工作走深走实。一、加强教育引导...
-
《乌塔》教学反思【精品多篇】
《乌塔》教学设计篇一教学内容:人教版第十册第七课学生视角:一个十四岁的德国小姑娘,独自一人游欧洲,这对没出过远门的中国小朋友来说,是一件不敢想的事。基于这种想法,学生必会以独特的思维,以赞扬或批评的态度来阅读这篇课文。教师思考:任何事情都要辩论地看,尤其是这...
-
经验做法:四步“廉”动持续推动廉洁文化建设
经验做法:四步“廉”动持续推动廉洁文化建设为全面贯彻落实党的二十大、二十届中央纪委三次全会有关加强新时代廉洁文化建设的相关要求,稳步推进x集团“崇德善建尚廉筑基”的廉洁文化理念见行见效,x公司纪委通过健全机制“强廉”、廉政教育“醒廉”、搭建载体“育...
相关文章
- A comparison of Chinese and Korean dining etiquette 中韩饮食礼仪之比较
- 10 Tips on Chinese Table Manners
- Unit 6 How many? Part ALet’s learn & Let’s chant教学设计
- Air Quality Devices - Marketing Research Proposal
- Lesson20 The Spring Festival Is Coming!说课稿2篇
- Unit 3 The sentence patterns of Comparative Degree 同级比较句型(微课)
- PEP四年级上册Unit2 My schoolbag Let’s spell 教学案例
- 《Unit 5 What does he do? Part A Let’s learn》 教材分析与处理
- Cultivate students' good English learning habits,Improve the effectiveness of classroom teachin
- This is my father 教学设计Lesson one